White Wolf Community

A Changeling Feminist?

This post has 87 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 625
Blood Lore:

So yes I'm still accusing C:tL to be sexist/discriminating.....


Really? Because I think it's sexist to say that traditional roles are required to be sexist.

What about a Fairy Godmother is forced to be a sexist role? You have a powerful woman with potent magic who decides who prospers and who falters based on her own judgments.

What about a wicked stepmother is forced to be sexist? Is it sexist just because you dislike your husband's children, and all women are required to be loving and caring? Or is it sexist to say that women are required to be good people all the time, because they're just so sweet-natured?

Is Prince Charming a sexist role, automatically? What happens if the Prince is a gay man who rescues extremely camp gay men who fall into the traditional category of princesses? What if Charming can only succeed because of the women in his life leading him, or even fighting his battles for him?


Assuming that traditional roles are sexist by nature is a very dangerous trap to fall into, because it can quickly blind you to the flexibility that people can put into them. A strong-willed princess
"Admiration is the furthest thing from understanding."

Patchwork Champions: Don't worry, the robot ninja tree is a good guy.
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 321
Blood Lore:
So yes I'm still accusing C:tL to be sexist/discriminating.....

Let me explain your syllogism to make sure I understand it:

You claim that the nature of Fae magic is fundamentally flawed and a particular expression of this, a very narrow one at that as the post above illustrates, rewards power to those who will unabashedly act corrupt and against progressive women's rights movements, and that you must make a sacrifice (i.e. said power) to do what you believe is right, thus making yourself a more noble character.

I completely agree.
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 460
What you're saying is: "Because WW didn't specifically create this supernatural line with me in mind, and because they didn't market it specifically at me, I'm not going to put in the little effort that it would take for me to change the game to something that I would enjoy."

In that case, this thread is just about done, I think.

On the other hand, instead of saying, "Oops, I guess I can't play it now!" *wink, wink*, you could just ask us to help you create a different framework for the game. Other players, anyway. I have no interest in indulging you anymore.
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,132
Blood Lore:
I think this is because that Freeholds run under a feudal system

No they don't.  I've pointed this out to you before & you ignored me then too.  They use feudal terms, but they are not inherently feudal.  Most are meritocracies, some are socialist democracies, etc. etc.

Blood Lore:
I guess I  would have prefer my changeling character to be courtless or setting up their own societies/factions based on progressive ideals (communism/anarchism/socialism/etc) similar  to The Carthian Movement/Free Council/etc if this was the case if your saying was true....


You don't need a "Court" dedicated to said ideals to have your character dedicated to said ideals - the Courts are in no way inherently hostile to them. The Courts are about emotion, not economic policy! Play a Summer Courtier that's driven by their rage toward oppression!

Blood Lore:
"How do Changelings view real world domestic violence/abuse/slavery/etc"


Many with extreme hostility.  Others don't care because it's not the Gentry.  Some committ such crimes themselves.  They're is no default perception, that's why there are individual characters.  Your worldview is not handed to you by your splat.
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,132
Blood Lore:
If not then I'm sorry to say this but I have to conclude that C:tL is actually a sexist game which is a major turn off for me and there goes my interest of the only NWoD gameline out of the window....I guess I should stick to the OWoD if this is the case...

You're offended the game based on fairytale horror includes fairytale archetypes?  There's nothing sexist about it, especially since gender & sex have nothing to do with those roles (at least how i run it); it's just that the Wyrd does play along with narratives.

Have I mentioned that you make me embaressed as a feminist.

Changeling is about standing up against abuse, being a survivor, taking the power back, and making a world for yourself.  The fact that the game doesn't spell out "here's a good guy Changeling faction to bravely stand up against those things, so you don't have to do any work within your group" isn't a flaw.
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,519
Blood Lore:

Is there's any alternative rules for those who don't want to confined into stereotypes and allowing 3-dimensional flexible characters? Like for example removing the wyrd and present it as a falsehood fashioned by Changeling society much like pseudoscience is?
You missed my point, I fear.   I said that you get some bonuses, not that the game tries to force you into these roles.    Being a feminist may very well be the best for characters in the long run, preventing them from becoming like the Gentry themselves.   However, there are definite downsides to the issue that you're not seeing- being gender blind takes away some power, and power is addictive.   Power helps hold the Others at bay.   Power makes you more like the Gentry.  

Changelings are often trapped in an eternal cycle, the abused becoming the abusers.  Breaking the cycle when you're rewarded for staying inside it is hard.   And that's the point- its supposed to be a struggle.   Feminists and other social reformations would likely be in the minority.

Also, note that feminists can also take things to extremes (which the Lost are well known for doing), and that's just as bad as any thing else.  
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 298
Friv Yeti:
The Gentry don't have any anti-woman bias as a group. Individual Gentry might, since they all view the world through a crazy-lens, but overall you're lucky if the Gentry can even conceive of gender as something that isn't chosen for fun.
True, the Fae are far too mutable for fixed sex or gender to make much sense. For instance, during their long-standing feud the Seven-Sinned Marchessa might vanquish the Lord of the Frozen Orchard and claim that particular Title as a trophy, becoming both the Marchessa and the Lord; but some time afterwards yet another rival could then in fair battle carry away the Title of the Marchessa, leaving behind only the Lord... who might choose not to manifest as a man at all but rather as an actual snow-covered orchard.
Not Ranked
Posts 24
If Blood Lore isn't absolutely offended yet, he will be after reading this:

What about the possibility that feminism itself is bad and caused by the Gentry? Put down your pitchforks people and listen for a moment.

As much as people like to argue otherwise, gender is more than "innies and outies"; male and female minds think differently, react differently, and even have different physical capabilities. For example, women in general have higher pain tolerance, while men generally have greater strength potential.

Much of traditional roles is nothing more than general observations about where people fit.(You want more proof, consider the disproportionate number of house husbands who get divorced and cheated on by the bread-winning wife who "wants a real man.") And where these roles go is, in many ways, determined by forces outside of the people's - and society's - control. A woman 8 months pregnant simply cannot march up a mountainside with a gun strapped to her back.

Now, let's look at the Gentry. The idea of something not under their control limiting them is an alien concept; this is how the freeholds defend against Them. By encouraging and influencing people into a mindset of "Men and women can do everything exactly equally," they are both weakening people as a collective - making them easier to capture and enslave - while simultaneously attempting to alter and nullify the concept of gender as an outside factor, making it easier for the Gentry to understand and use against their prey.
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 270
Fergurg:
As much as people like to argue otherwise, gender is more than "innies and outies"; male and female minds think differently, react differently, and even have different physical capabilities. For example, women in general have higher pain tolerance, while men generally have greater strength potential.


I think most of this has to do of what society (Capitalism especially) has socially conditioned them to be eversince childbirth although it doesn't always work on everyone since people work on a individual level and I don't think that gender is a hive mind...

I think the post you made was simply a backlash I presume...
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 22
Blood Lore:
I think most of this has to do of what society (Capitalism especially) has socially conditioned them to be eversince childbirth....


hahahahaha....
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 270
dean:
Blood Lore:
I think most of this has to do of what society (Capitalism especially) has socially conditioned them to be eversince childbirth....


hahahahaha....


Well I could have said that "even if it's true then it's most likely...."

I think I'm at the point that I'm done with this thread since it's almost getting to a off-topic flamewar (or maybe this entire thread was a flamewar and that is getting worse....).
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 17
May I make an observation?

This is a roleplaying game.  It is a framework, meant to allow players and storytellers to create stories that are enjoyable to tell and play out.  And, as WW has said on so many occasions it's really part of my brain now (paraphrased), "If you don't like something, change it."  Blood Lore, if the concept of the game causes you this much trouble, then perhaps you might want to consider changing it up a bit.  But here's my take on things:

The Others do not understand humanity.  They are best described as solipsistic, narcissistic, and amoral in relation to human standards.  The most important being in their universe is them.  Whatever bad traits that humanity possesses, they are by no means as extreme as the Others.  And to blame the Others for centuries of social framework - when they probably don't even understand said framework - is not necessarily a logical step.  An eight year old doesn't consider the social structure of a beehive when they throw a rock at it, just to see what happens.

( Side note.  Capitalism is a recent invention.  Women have had trouble from the established Western European societal structures for a bit longer than that.  Suffrage, amazingly enough, isn't strictly a women's movement. )

As for fitting into stories, if that bothers you so much, then perhaps there's a chance to explore the theme of creating new stories.  Something like that could become a much larger, much more epic, storytelling experience than a game centered around Court politics.  There are always possibilities for a good, enjoyable game experience.
I can believe things that are true and I can believe things that aren't true and I can believe things where nobody knows if they're true or not.
     - Neil Gaiman, American Gods
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 862
Just pick your story.

Like the descent of Anat into the Underworld:  Anat was a Canaanite warrior goddess whose brother (Baal Hadad) was taken by the god of death (Baal Mot); unlike most mythological descents by goddesses into the Underworld, she stormed the place, beat the tar out of Mot, wore his entrails as a hat, and took her brother back.  Use that as your sister archetype.

Or the earliest known version of Red Riding Hood, where the wolf tricks her into eating her grandmother's flesh, but then she tricks him and escapes (the one where he eats her came later).  And call that a descent and return where power is drawn from ancestors, and the character experiences an initiation through adversity, but in doing so discovers their strength or cunning.

Or what Friv Yeti said earlier about the fairy godmother.  Play that power up in a big way:  you preside over initiations, you're the high priestess, the baptist; you choose who is anointed.  You're the king- or queenmaker, and there's no reason why you can't express that through the lens of Joan of Arc or Medea as much as Vivian of the Lake.

Durga in her big legend was not merely a warrior, but a chosen champion in whom the hopes of all the gods were invested.

CuChulain might have been a man, but his charioteer was a woman, as was Scathach who first trained him (Scathach was also a blacksmith, which was a powerful role to the Celts).

You can find a story to match any role or archetype you want.  Not happy with the common ones, just pick a story that doesn't have them.  The Wyrd stretches a long way.  And you could easily have it reward those who search out stories to power the role they want to live rather than living according to the stories they know well.

Or you could not bother with these roles at all.  They're only a small part of the mythos, and not a reason to accept or reject the game.
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,132
Fergurg:
As much as people like to argue otherwise, gender is more than "innies and outies"; male and female minds think differently, react differently, and even have different physical capabilities. For example, women in general have higher pain tolerance, while men generally have greater strength potential.

There are tendencies effected by sex, yes.  But these pale in comparison to the variances between people as individuals.

To suggest that a drive for people to be able to determine their own destinies and be judged as individuals rather than as part of the biological group they born into "weakens people as a collective" is actually quite sexist Fergurg.


This does not mean I'm agreeing with Blood Lore's reductionist drive to force everything into conflict over economic policy.  The OP seems blissfully unaware that Feminism =!= Socialist-Anarchism.  There are some Feminists who are ALSO Socialists &/or Anarchists, but the two are not synonyms.
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,519
glamourweaver:
Fergurg:
As much as people like to argue otherwise, gender is more than "innies and outies"; male and female minds think differently, react differently, and even have different physical capabilities. For example, women in general have higher pain tolerance, while men generally have greater strength potential.

There are tendencies effected by sex, yes.  But these pale in comparison to the variances between people as individuals.

To suggest that a drive for people to be able to determine their own destinies and be judged as individuals rather than as part of the biological group they born into "weakens people as a collective" is actually quite sexist Fergurg.
Except that Fergurg is scientifically correct.   The presence of large amounts estrogen or testosterone in the body actually changes the way that the brain operates.   For instance, the female brain can link emotions and facts far more readily than the masculine brain.   Its why men have the stereotypical trouble of remembering their anniversaries.   There are recorded differences between the male and female bodies and minds.   Its not sexist when you're simply observing facts and tendecies.
Page 3 of 6 (88 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » | RSS
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems