White Wolf Publishing

Username Password  
     
Forgot Password?   Register
The 2/7 Filter
NgOroo
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:14:44 AM(UTC)

I googled it. No luck. Can anyone explain the mechanism of the 2/7 Filter, or point me at it?

Thx
Segev
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:21:22 AM(UTC)

Have a high passive defense value to try to protect yourself from most damage. This is the "2" part, because you announce your DV in step 2. Have a perfect soak or other perfect defense that activates in Step 7 so that, if you fail to defend against an attack with your DV (somebody manages to get through it), you can activate your late-step perfect to negate damage.



A full-fledged 2/7 Filter also has a combo of surprise-negator and perfect dodge/parry, but those are only used when somebody announces in Step 1 that they are using a bad touch Charm. If it's bad touch without surprise, just use the Step 2 perfect that keeps you from being touched. IF it's bad touch with surprise, activate the combo to negate and dodge/parry to avoid being touched. If it's surprise but it's not bad touch (so damage is all you're afraid of), let it through your step two and activate your step 7 perfect soak, since perfect soak doesn't care about surprise.



In combat, this will save you the maximum motes because, against non-surprise attacks, you will mostly pay nothing as your passive DV blocks all hits. When they surprise attack you for damage, or they get lucky and get by your DV, you spend 4m on your perfect soak. You've already saved a lot because you only spend active motes when somebody gets by your DV. You're still safe if they whip out bad touch because you CAN protect yourself in STep 2, and you save motes unless they use bad touch.

The Demented One
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:24:36 AM(UTC)

tl;dr: High DV + SSE/HGD + AST. 
NgOroo
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:25:52 AM(UTC)

"The Demented One" wrote:
tl;dr: High DV + SSE/HGD + AST.
Can you spell out those charms? I'd be much thankful...
The Demented One
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:28:13 AM(UTC)

"NgOroo" wrote:
"The Demented One" wrote:
tl;dr: High DV + SSE/HGD + AST.
Can you spell out those charms? I'd be much thankful...
Seven Shadow Evasion, Heavenly Guardian Defense*, Adamant Skin Technique.

*In general, the 3m cost of SSE means that it'll always be better than 4m HGD for making a 2/7. The parry still works, but it's not the most optimized implementation of the filter.
Ebon Dragon
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:28:15 AM(UTC)

Step 2 perfect defense + step 7 perfect soak.  Seven Shadows Evasion, Heavenly Guardian Defense, Iron Skin Concentration (may not be viable post-errata), Adamant Skin Technique, etc.  Most efficient defense in the game.

Here to brighten your day.

My homebrew is not canon. Do not assume what I make will port seamlessly into your game or a vanilla one.

Primordial Essays
ShadowDragon8685
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:28:26 AM(UTC)

DV = Defense Value, not a Charm.

SSE = Seven Shadow Evasion, better acronymized as 7SE in my opinion.

HGD = Heavenly Guardian Defense

AST = Adamant Skin Technique

Demetrius7997 wrote:
Monkipi wrote:
The Exalted Forums: Where a thread about masturbation becomes a thread about the weather, and a thread about the weather becomes a thread about masturbation.

I want to quote this in my sig so badly but feel it would be inappropriate as a moderator and I probably don't have enough room left over anyway.


The Exalted Forums: Even our admins are immature and awesomely chill.
Segev
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:28:50 AM(UTC)

"NgOroo" wrote:
"The Demented One" wrote:
tl;dr: High DV + SSE/HGD + AST.
Can you spell out those charms? I'd be much thankful...


DV == Defense Value (your passive defense target number)



SSE == Seven Shadow Evasion (step 2 perfect dodge, applicability-trumping)



HGD == Heaven Guardian Defense (step 2 perfect parry, applicability-trumping)



AST == Adamant Skin Technique (step 7 perfect soak, neutralizes all damage that might possibly be inflicted from any source related to this attack for the remainder of the combat steps of this attack)

Lafing Cat
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:52:19 AM(UTC)

I like how 4 people all posted the acronyms within a minute.

Resident Forum Prism Cat

Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:52:46 AM(UTC)

"Lafing Cat" wrote:
I like how 4 people all posted the acronyms within a minute.




TLAs are annoying.
Lafing Cat
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:53:37 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
TLAs are annoying.
IMO, TLA FTW.

Resident Forum Prism Cat

Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:54:09 AM(UTC)

"Lafing Cat" wrote:
IMO, TLA FTW.




Win.
Segev
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:00:17 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
"Lafing Cat" wrote:
IMO, TLA FTW.




Win.

Yes.
Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:01:23 AM(UTC)

Man, I feel nostalgic. When I invented this thing, there were still people claiming Essence Flow was a good Charm for your primary combat ability, defending Obsidian Shards of Infinity and looking forward to the release of Sidereals.

ShadowDragon8685
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:07:12 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
Man, I feel nostalgic. When I invented this thing, there were still people claiming Essence Flow was a good Charm for your primary combat ability, defending Obsidian Shards of Infinity and looking forward to the release of Sidereals.






People defending Obsidian Shards of Infinity?



Were they mad, or just, say... Mad?
Demetrius7997 wrote:
Monkipi wrote:
The Exalted Forums: Where a thread about masturbation becomes a thread about the weather, and a thread about the weather becomes a thread about masturbation.

I want to quote this in my sig so badly but feel it would be inappropriate as a moderator and I probably don't have enough room left over anyway.


The Exalted Forums: Even our admins are immature and awesomely chill.
Eel
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:09:37 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
Man, I feel nostalgic. When I invented this thing, there were still people claiming Essence Flow was a good Charm for your primary combat ability.




Just out of curiosity, what's your opinion on Essence Flow these days? Did Supreme Perfection of (Ability)'s discount make it any more palatable?
Sojiko
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:17:09 AM(UTC)

"Eel" wrote:

Just out of curiosity, what's your opinion on Essence Flow these days? Did Supreme Perfection of (Ability)'s discount make it any more palatable?
Not really, it's still not really an option in combat, you can't afford to waste 5m on an attack that is going to be perfected for 3m, and why spend 3~5m to raise your DV when 3m will perfect?

1m for +1DV loses to Shadow Over Water, and usually so does 2m.



So, it's hardly ever worth the trouble, at least not on main powers.



It's nice on those side Abilities for which you can't afford an I(A)M.

Ilushia
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:19:54 AM(UTC)

"Sojiko" wrote:
It's nice on those side Abilities for which you can't afford an I(A)M.




I also find it really useful for those Abilities which you don't want to bother putting it into combos for, like Larceny, Craft, Investigation and Ride. Things you may have to roll outside combat and don't really want to bother building a combo for them as you only need to use a single other Charm with it at a time.
Sojiko
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:21:00 AM(UTC)

"NgOroo" wrote:
I googled it. No luck. Can anyone explain the mechanism of the 2/7 Filter, or point me at it?
To make it simple:



Step 7 defenses like Adamant Skin Technique have the advantage of being declared after seeing if the opponent beats your DV. If you are hit 50% of the time (let's say equal opponent), you pay 4m half the time, so 2m per attack, which is cheaper than Seven Shadows Evasion.

That's why the perfect "soak" are so good and you want to use them.



But a soak won't protect you from bad touches, since it only negates damage, this is something that you need Seven Shadows Evasion (in Step 2) to defend against.



So 1st defense is better, but has holes that the 2nd covers at a steeper price. The 2/7 defense is combining both of those for the best of both world: perfectly covered with SSE, and using AST's efficiency any time it is possible to do so.

Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:43:35 AM(UTC)

"ShadowDragon8685" wrote:
People defending Obsidian Shards of Infinity?



Were they mad, or just, say... Mad?




Nah. Narrativists and Rule 0 Fallacy, mostly - "It's OK if it's broken, the GM won't kill you until the plot demands it" and "It's OK if it's broken, the GM will fix it".

Aquillion
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:00:45 AM(UTC)

"Sojiko" wrote:
Step 7 defenses like Adamant Skin Technique have the advantage of being declared after seeing if the opponent beats your DV. If you are hit 50% of the time (let's say equal opponent), you pay 4m half the time, so 2m per attack, which is cheaper than Seven Shadows Evasion.

That's why the perfect "soak" are so good and you want to use them.



But a soak won't protect you from bad touches, since it only negates damage, this is something that you need Seven Shadows Evasion (in Step 2) to defend against.



So 1st defense is better, but has holes that the 2nd covers at a steeper price. The 2/7 defense is combining both of those for the best of both world: perfectly covered with SSE, and using AST's efficiency any time it is possible to do so.
And nowadays, Lightspeed Body Dynamics makes this even better, since every time your DV successfully blocks an attack, you regain motes (you didn't actually activate a perfect with a FoI!  You had one in reserve, so you weren't actually taking a risk at all, but you didn't use it.)

Center-of-All
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:02:05 AM(UTC)
Doesn't this set up burn you if your opponents are running with late-step bad touches?

Aquillion
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:04:45 AM(UTC)

"Center-of-All" wrote:
Doesn't this set up burn you if your opponents are running with late-step bad touches?
Your opponent has to announce the combo they're using when they use their first charm.  If it has a late-step bad touch in it, use your Step 2 perfect.  (This is also part of the reason why late step bad touch effects are so powerful or, really, any unkeyworded free/scenelong/permanent Bad Touch effect period -- no, they usually won't screw you over instantly, but they wreck the 2-7 filter by forcing you to step 2 perfect everything.  Of course, if the bad touch in question has a thwartable keyword, the answer is just to become immune to that keyword.)



Also, such effects are very rare, and virtually all of them either require doing damage (meaning your Step 7 perfect soak stops them), or are Shaping, or both.

Center-of-All
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:13:58 AM(UTC)
"Aquillion" wrote:
Your opponent has to announce the combo they're using when they use their first charm. 




Ah, forgot about that bit. Mixed it up with the charm use declaration. My bad.
leo1925
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:42:10 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
"ShadowDragon8685" wrote:
People defending Obsidian Shards of Infinity?



Were they mad, or just, say... Mad?




Nah. Narrativists and Rule 0 Fallacy, mostly - "It's OK if it's broken, the GM won't kill you until the plot demands it" and "It's OK if it's broken, the GM will fix it".




How could someone defend that? Even with rule 0 fallacy, how did they expect someone to fix all of that? Did anyone defended scarlet battlefield?
ShadowDragon8685
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:47:08 AM(UTC)

Put it this way, Leo: as-written, the pinnacle charm of OSOI allows a one-Charm kill on Sol Invictus that bypasses the Aegis of Unconquerable Might - and all other defensive powers, for that matter - by skipping the battle and presuming the outcome, then making that reality.



If anything's 'worse' than as-written OSOI, it's beyond retarded.

Demetrius7997 wrote:
Monkipi wrote:
The Exalted Forums: Where a thread about masturbation becomes a thread about the weather, and a thread about the weather becomes a thread about masturbation.

I want to quote this in my sig so badly but feel it would be inappropriate as a moderator and I probably don't have enough room left over anyway.


The Exalted Forums: Even our admins are immature and awesomely chill.
leo1925
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:12:22 AM(UTC)

"ShadowDragon8685" wrote:
Put it this way, Leo: as-written, the pinnacle charm of OSOI allows a one-Charm kill on Sol Invictus that bypasses the Aegis of Unconquerable Might - and all other defensive powers, for that matter - by skipping the battle and presuming the outcome, then making that reality.




Yes i know how idiotic OSOI is and how much more idiotic it's pinnacle is, it's basically saying you that you are so good you don't even have to do battle you can just chose the outcome.



What i asked is how people could defend that, how did they expect themselves to fix all that? That's what i couldn't understand.
Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:04:26 AM(UTC)

"leo1925" wrote:
How could someone defend that? Even with rule 0 fallacy, how did they expect someone to fix all of that? Did anyone defended scarlet battlefield?




People are stupid, and yes.



You want to know why I hate the rule 0 fallacy and narrativist arguments in mechanical threads, you can trace it back to there.
leo1925
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:09:09 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
You want to know why I hate the rule 0 fallacy and narrativist arguments in mechanical threads, you can trace it back to there.




I can understand it.
Sojiko
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:38:50 AM(UTC)

"Aquillion" wrote:
"Sojiko" wrote:
*explanation of the 2/7 filter*
And nowadays, Lightspeed Body Dynamics makes this even better, since every time your DV successfully blocks an attack, you regain motes (you didn't actually activate a perfect with a FoI!  You had one in reserve, so you weren't actually taking a risk at all, but you didn't use it.)
Actually, it's so good it create a new tier of build.



The same way that having a perfect put you in a distinct category, and that a full paranoia combo does that yet another time, and that 2/7 filters reign supreme over those, the 2/7+LBD make a mockery out of the regular 2/7 builds.



From the paranoia level up, your motes are your life point and are invincible as long as your pools aren't empty. So it's just about efficiency, and the 2/7 is much more efficient than the regular perfect spamming. But with LBD your filter become so efficient that your mote bleed rate can become negative against some opponents. That means total invincibility.

And that's not just some very weak opponents either, an E3 Solar has the tools to do that to the Ebon Dragon (yes, a primordial) or the Unconquered Sun.

Bodhisattva
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:41:55 AM(UTC)
Do I smell a "win" button?

Xelloss33
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:54:15 AM(UTC)

"Bodhisattva" wrote:
Do I smell a "win" button?
Not completly as there are weaknesses : you can force the step 2 perfect ( good luck to do that for less than 3 m) or overload the reactor max 20m.
But yeah, LBD is that powerful.
Custom Charms
Fist of the Daystar Style, the Solar Hero Style rewrite. For MA Solars using Solar Charms.
Unofficial clarifications from the authors.
Revan058
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:55:23 AM(UTC)

"Sojiko" wrote:


And that's not just some very weak opponents either, an E3 Solar has the tools to do that to the Ebon Dragon (yes, a primordial) or the Unconquered Sun.




Well, to be utterly fair, against the US, you can keep stunting and getting your motes up. But, he's just swinging that spear, and all it takes is one hit. And, unless you got his Valor( I think it's valor) he's just laughing at you. You can only stunt SO long, before it gets boring, so...he's got you. He's just got to wait.
Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:08:35 AM(UTC)

"Bodhisattva" wrote:
Do I smell a "win" button?




It needs to be 1 mote, or (OppEssence-YourEssence) min 1, at worst.
Demetrius7997
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:15:57 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
People are stupid, and yes.



You want to know why I hate the rule 0 fallacy and narrativist arguments in mechanical threads, you can trace it back to there.
Just for my peace of mind do you mean you can trace it back to the OSOI argument? Or are you saying you can trace it back to narrativists being stupid?

This space being blank has been bugging me so my signature is now a place holder until I come up with something better.
leo1925
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:18:36 AM(UTC)

"Demetrius7997" wrote:
Just for my peace of mind do you mean you can trace it back to the OSOI argument? Or are you saying you can trace it back to narrativists being stupid?




I think that he means the OSOI arguement
Jon Chung
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:39:04 AM(UTC)

"Demetrius7997" wrote:
Just for my peace of mind do you mean you can trace it back to the OSOI argument? Or are you saying you can trace it back to narrativists being stupid?




OSoI = hate, hate, all of my hate.
Daneel Rush
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:54:33 AM(UTC)
"Jon Chung" wrote:
"Demetrius7997" wrote:
Just for my peace of mind do you mean you can trace it back to the OSOI argument? Or are you saying you can trace it back to narrativists being stupid?




OSoI = hate, hate, all of my hate.




Bu-but it's so PWETTY! *wiggle, wiggle*
Sojiko
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:54:42 AM(UTC)

"Demetrius7997" wrote:
Just for my peace of mind do you mean you can trace it back to the OSOI argument? Or are you saying you can trace it back to narrativists being stupid?
He's saying you can trace his hate of narrativist arguments (not players) in mechanical discussions back to OSoI.

Sojiko
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 10:02:08 AM(UTC)

"Bodhisattva" wrote:
Do I smell a "win" button?
Not much more than the perfects, or the late step filters.

Having it means that those who don't are hardly a threat, but they can have it too!



Also, as Xeloss said it's beatable. If you are attacking 6 times at 50% accuracy overall, the opponent spends 6m to defend and wins 9m for those time you missed. So if you are 3 to attack like that, the opponent spends 18m and wins "27", except the Reactor keyword brings him down to 20, so he's only at +2m per action. Now add just a bit of accuracy or volume of attack, and you can break the dodge reactor by overloading it.

When you are fighting group vs group, it's "everyone gangs up on 1 opponent until he dies, then move on to the next one" faced with those defenses. With regular paranoia, it's "spread out your attacks to make as many opponents as possible spend the Xm to flurry break", so basically the opposite.



Of course when 2 such builds are in solo combat, it tends to be "whac-whack-whack, well, that was a real waste of time, let's do something more productive now" because they can't really harm each other.

Demetrius7997
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 10:02:35 AM(UTC)

"Jon Chung" wrote:
"Demetrius7997" wrote:
Just for my peace of mind do you mean you can trace it back to the OSOI argument? Or are you saying you can trace it back to narrativists being stupid?




OSoI = hate, hate, all of my hate.
Thanks for the confirmation. I was about 99% certain that was what you meant, but wanted to make it 100% so there was zero chance of that old narrativism VS. simulationism argument steam rolling yet another thread.

This space being blank has been bugging me so my signature is now a place holder until I come up with something better.
KirBadrang
Saturday, October 09, 2010 1:15:25 AM(UTC)

Has anybody had a chance to work through the 2/7 in the presence of Overdrives and etc?
Kukla
Saturday, October 09, 2010 1:59:08 AM(UTC)

Overdrive definitely gives you more opportunities to force your opponent in to the '2' phase of the 2/7 filter, and thus reduce their mote efficiency.

Come check out Myriad Song, a retro-styled science fiction RPG. Or, go straight to our Kickstarter.
Exalted art and commissions by Myrrh. Kukla-Tested, Kukla-Approved.
Prices ranging from $10 for sketched busts to $70 for color figures.
Anteros
Saturday, October 09, 2010 3:03:03 AM(UTC)

"Sojiko" wrote:
From the paranoia level up, your motes are your life point and are invincible as long as your pools aren't empty. So it's just about efficiency, and the 2/7 is much more efficient than the regular perfect spamming. But with LBD your filter become so efficient that your mote bleed rate can become negative against some opponents. That means total invincibility.

And that's not just some very weak opponents either, an E3 Solar has the tools to do that to the Ebon Dragon (yes, a primordial) or the Unconquered Sun.


That makes the start of the Primordial War more believable, at least.

Your result for The Fantasy RPG Class Test...
The Paragon
wastevens
Saturday, October 09, 2010 7:29:32 AM(UTC)

"Anteros" wrote:
That makes the start of the Primordial War more believable, at least.

The question is marginally sliding from 'How could the Exalted Host have defeated the Primordials' and towards 'How did it take more than an afternoon'.

I trust that an Infernal November will help rebalance the scales. emotion-1.gif


AstraKiseki wrote:
What is balance? A miserable pile of mechanics! *smashes dice* But enough talk, have at you!
*join battle*


StephenLS wrote:
If we make the Realm a realistic empire it's going to come off as Snidely Whiplash.
Morangias
Saturday, October 09, 2010 9:10:28 AM(UTC)

"leo1925" wrote:
Did anyone defended scarlet battlefield?


I used to think SPB is the most balanced SMA in Scroll. In my defense, I was young and naive back then ;)
Users browsing this topic
Anonymous
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.